Home/Washington Supreme Court/James v. Cannell

James v. Cannell

246 P. 304, 139 Wash. 702, 1926 Wash. LEXIS 894
Washington Supreme Court·Decided June 2, 1926·No. No. 18957. En Banc.·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

ON REHEARING.
Upon a rehearing En Banc, a majority of the court adheres to the Department opinion heretofore filed herein and reported in135 Wn. 80, 237 P. 8. The judgment is therefore reversed and the cause remanded for proceedings in accordance with that opinion. *Page 703

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

James v. Cannell, 246 P. 304, 139 Wash. 702, 1926 Wash. LEXIS 894 (Wash. 1926).

246 P. 304 (James v. Cannell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

City of Seattle v. McCready
931 P.2d 156 (Washington Supreme Court, 1997)
Rorvig v. Douglas
873 P.2d 492 (Washington Supreme Court, 1994)