Home/Washington Supreme Court/James v. Cannell

James v. Cannell

246 P. 304, 139 Wash. 702, 1926 Wash. LEXIS 894
CourtWashington Supreme Court
DecidedJune 2, 1926
DocketNo. 18957. En Banc.
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 246 P. 304 (James v. Cannell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
James v. Cannell, 246 P. 304, 139 Wash. 702, 1926 Wash. LEXIS 894 (Wash. 1926).

Opinions

ON REHEARING.
Upon a rehearing En Banc, a majority of the court adheres to the Department opinion heretofore filed herein and reported in135 Wn. 80, 237 P. 8. The judgment is therefore reversed and the cause remanded for proceedings in accordance with that opinion. *Page 703

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

City of Seattle v. McCready
931 P.2d 156 (Washington Supreme Court, 1997)
Rorvig v. Douglas
873 P.2d 492 (Washington Supreme Court, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
246 P. 304, 139 Wash. 702, 1926 Wash. LEXIS 894, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-v-cannell-wash-1926.