James v. Berexco

W.D. Oklahoma

James v. Berexco

DecidedJuly 26, 2019

Docket5:19-cv-00646

StatusUnknown

This text of James v. Berexco (James v. Berexco) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

James v. Berexco, (W.D. Okla. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

A.J. JAMES, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) -vs- ) Case No. CIV-19-646-F ) BEREXCO LLC, et al., ) ) Defendants. )

ORDER The court is in receipt of International Energy Corporation’s Notice of Bankruptcy, filed July 19, 2019 (doc. no. 18). The notice advises that a voluntary petition for chapter 11 bankruptcy was filed for International Energy Corporation on June 3, 2019. The bankruptcy case is pending in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma, Case No. 19-bk-11142. The record before the court also reflects that a Notice of Bankruptcy was filed as to White Star Petroleum, LLC. Ex. 8 to doc. no. 1. The notice advises that an involuntary petition for chapter 11 bankruptcy was filed against White Star Petroleum, LLC, on May 24, 2019. The bankruptcy case is pending in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Oklahoma, Case No. 19-12145. The notice also advises that a voluntary petition for chapter 11 bankruptcy was filed by White Star Petroleum, LLC in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware, Case No. 19-11182-BLS, on May 28, 2019. Plaintiffs’ action against defendants, International Energy Corporation and White Star Petroleum, LLC, is therefore stayed pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 362. While section 362 of Title 11 extends the stay provisions of the Bankruptcy Code to the “debtor,” the rule followed in the Tenth Circuit and by the majority of other circuit courts is that the stay provision does not extend to the debtor’s co- defendants. See, Fortier v. Dona Anna Plaza Partners, 747 F.2d 1324, 1330 (10" Cir. 1984). A narrow exception to this rule has been recognized, see, A.H. Robins Co., Inc. v. Piccinin, 788 F.2d 994, 999 (4"" Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 876 (1986), but there is no indication in the notice that the remaining defendants would fall within the exception. Therefore, until otherwise notified, plaintiffs’ action continues as against the remaining defendants. IT IS SO ORDERED this 26" day of July, 2019.

AF Dut STEPHEN P. FRIOT —— UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

19-0646p001 docx

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

A.J. JAMES, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) -vs- ) Case No. CIV-19-646-F ) BEREXCO LLC, et al., ) ) Defendants. )

ORDER The court is in receipt of International Energy Corporation’s Notice of Bankruptcy, filed July 19, 2019 (doc. no. 18). The notice advises that a voluntary petition for chapter 11 bankruptcy was filed for International Energy Corporation on June 3, 2019. The bankruptcy case is pending in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma, Case No. 19-bk-11142. The record before the court also reflects that a Notice of Bankruptcy was filed as to White Star Petroleum, LLC. Ex. 8 to doc. no. 1. The notice advises that an involuntary petition for chapter 11 bankruptcy was filed against White Star Petroleum, LLC, on May 24, 2019. The bankruptcy case is pending in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Oklahoma, Case No. 19-12145. The notice also advises that a voluntary petition for chapter 11 bankruptcy was filed by White Star Petroleum, LLC in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware, Case No. 19-11182-BLS, on May 28, 2019. Plaintiffs’ action against defendants, International Energy Corporation and White Star Petroleum, LLC, is therefore stayed pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 362. While section 362 of Title 11 extends the stay provisions of the Bankruptcy Code to the “debtor,” the rule followed in the Tenth Circuit and by the majority of other circuit courts is that the stay provision does not extend to the debtor’s co- defendants. See, Fortier v. Dona Anna Plaza Partners, 747 F.2d 1324, 1330 (10" Cir. 1984). A narrow exception to this rule has been recognized, see, A.H. Robins Co., Inc. v. Piccinin, 788 F.2d 994, 999 (4"" Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 876 (1986), but there is no indication in the notice that the remaining defendants would fall within the exception. Therefore, until otherwise notified, plaintiffs’ action continues as against the remaining defendants. IT IS SO ORDERED this 26" day of July, 2019.

AF Dut STEPHEN P. FRIOT —— UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

19-0646p001 docx

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

James v. Berexco, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-v-berexco-okwd-2019.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack