James v. Bennett
This text of 10 Wend. 540 (James v. Bennett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
By the Court,
The statute says the action of ejectment shall not abate by the death of the plaintiff after issue, and before verdict or judgment, but the same proceedings may be had as in other actions, to substitute the names of those who may succeed to the title of the plaintiff thus dying; in which case the issue shall be tried as between the original parties. 3 R. S. 308, § 33. Other actions abate by the death of a sole plaintiff before interlocutory judgment or verdict; by this statute ejectment does not abate, and the parties succeeding to the title may be substituted, not by motion, however, but by proceedings usual in other actions, that is, by scire facias. The motion is denied, with costs, to be paid by the trustees,
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
10 Wend. 540, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-v-bennett-nysupct-1833.