James v. Bank

Supreme Court

James v. Bank

74 U.S. 692, 19 L. Ed. 275, 7 Wall. 692, 1868 U.S. LEXIS 1052

DecidedApril 15, 1869

StatusPublished

This text of 74 U.S. 692 (James v. Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

James v. Bank, 74 U.S. 692, 19 L. Ed. 275, 7 Wall. 692, 1868 U.S. LEXIS 1052 (1869).

Pincite

Opinion

*693 The CHIEF JUSTICE

delivered the opinion of the court.

, The regular coúrse, in cases of this description, is to affirm the judgments. The appeal is regularly here, and cannot be dismissed-for want of jurisdiction. The motion, there-, fore, 'must be denied.

Counsel for the appellee has referred us to. an order dis-. missing a writ of error at the last term,- under eircúmstaiices, like those of the case before us. This order must have been entered through inadvertence,' and cannot bé drawn into á' precedent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*693 The CHIEF JUSTICE

delivered the opinion of the court.

, The regular coúrse, in cases of this description, is to affirm the judgments. The appeal is regularly here, and cannot be dismissed-for want of jurisdiction. The motion, there-, fore, 'must be denied.

Counsel for the appellee has referred us to. an order dis-. missing a writ of error at the last term,- under eircúmstaiices, like those of the case before us. This order must have been entered through inadvertence,' and cannot bé drawn into á' precedent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

74 U.S. 692, 19 L. Ed. 275, 7 Wall. 692, 1868 U.S. LEXIS 1052, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-v-bank-scotus-1869.