James v. Bank

74 U.S. 692, 19 L. Ed. 275, 7 Wall. 692, 1868 U.S. LEXIS 1052
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided April 15, 1869·Published

Opinion

*693 The CHIEF JUSTICE

delivered the opinion of the court.

, The regular coúrse, in cases of this description, is to affirm the judgments. The appeal is regularly here, and cannot be dismissed-for want of jurisdiction. The motion, there-, fore, 'must be denied.

Counsel for the appellee has referred us to. an order dis-. missing a writ of error at the last term,- under eircúmstaiices, like those of the case before us. This order must have been entered through inadvertence,' and cannot bé drawn into á' precedent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

James v. Bank, 74 U.S. 692, 19 L. Ed. 275, 7 Wall. 692, 1868 U.S. LEXIS 1052 (1869).

74 U.S. 692 (James v. Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.