James v. . Baker
113 S.E. 507, 184 N.C. 612, 1922 N.C. LEXIS 136
Opinion
Tbe exceptions debated before us, and wbicb are brought forward in plaintiff’s brief, deal principally with tbe charge of tbe court on tbe subject of constructive and adverse possession. After a careful perusal of tbe record, as it relates to these exceptions, we are unable to discover any error. Tbe case seems to have been tried in substantial conformity to our decisions on tbe subject, and we have found no sufficient reason for disturbing tbe result of tbe trial.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
James v. . Baker, 113 S.E. 507, 184 N.C. 612, 1922 N.C. LEXIS 136 (N.C. 1922).
113 S.E. 507 (James v. . Baker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.