James v. . Baker

Supreme Court of North Carolina

James v. . Baker

113 S.E. 507, 184 N.C. 612, 1922 N.C. LEXIS 136

DecidedSeptember 20, 1922

StatusPublished

This text of 113 S.E. 507 (James v. . Baker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

James v. . Baker, 113 S.E. 507, 184 N.C. 612, 1922 N.C. LEXIS 136 (N.C. 1922).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee OueiaM.

Tbe exceptions debated before us, and wbicb are brought forward in plaintiff’s brief, deal principally with tbe charge of tbe court on tbe subject of constructive and adverse possession. After a careful perusal of tbe record, as it relates to these exceptions, we are unable to discover any error. Tbe case seems to have been tried in substantial conformity to our decisions on tbe subject, and we have found no sufficient reason for disturbing tbe result of tbe trial.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee OueiaM.

Tbe exceptions debated before us, and wbicb are brought forward in plaintiff’s brief, deal principally with tbe charge of tbe court on tbe subject of constructive and adverse possession. After a careful perusal of tbe record, as it relates to these exceptions, we are unable to discover any error. Tbe case seems to have been tried in substantial conformity to our decisions on tbe subject, and we have found no sufficient reason for disturbing tbe result of tbe trial.

No error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

113 S.E. 507, 184 N.C. 612, 1922 N.C. LEXIS 136, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-v-baker-nc-1922.