James v. Badger

New York Supreme Court

James v. Badger

1 Johns. Cas. 131

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 15, 1799

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 1 Johns. Cas. 131 (James v. Badger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

James v. Badger, 1 Johns. Cas. 131 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1799).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

An acceptance of a part from the maker, does not discharge the endorser, provided the holder gives notice in time, that he looks to him for the residue. Here notice was given, but it was general, and in the usual form, without specifying that any part had been paid. Although this was not strictly correct, according to the fact, yet we think it was sufficient for every beneficial purpose of notice to the endorsers.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

An acceptance of a part from the maker, does not discharge the endorser, provided the holder gives notice in time, that he looks to him for the residue. Here notice was given, but it was general, and in the usual form, without specifying that any part had been paid. Although this was not strictly correct, according to the fact, yet we think it was sufficient for every beneficial purpose of notice to the endorsers.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Johns. Cas. 131, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-v-badger-nysupct-1799.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack