James Trotter v. State
This text of James Trotter v. State (James Trotter v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant's complaint is that there was no allegation of a culpable mental state in the information. This offense was committed prior to September 1, 1995, the effective date of the amendment of the DWI statute that expressly dispensed with any culpable mental state. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 49.11 (West Supp. 1998).
We have previously decided this precise issue in Sanders v. State, 936 S.W.2d 436, (Tex. App.--Austin 1997, pet. ref'd) (holding that the DWI statute did not require proof of a culpable mental state even before the enactment of section 49.11). We followed the decision in Ex parte Ross, 522 S.W.2d 214 (Tex. Crim. App. 1975), which held that no proof of a culpable mental state was required in a DWI case. We overrule appellant's point of error.
We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
John Powers, Justice
Before Justices Powers, Aboussie and B. A. Smith
Affirmed
Filed: December 11, 1997
Do Not Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
James Trotter v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-trotter-v-state-texapp-1997.