James Tree & Crane Serv. v. Fought ‎(2)‎

2015 Ark. 158
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedApril 9, 2015
DocketCV-14-585
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 2015 Ark. 158 (James Tree & Crane Serv. v. Fought ‎(2)‎) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
James Tree & Crane Serv. v. Fought ‎(2)‎, 2015 Ark. 158 (Ark. 2015).

Opinion

Cite as 2015 Ark. 158

SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CV-14-585

JAMES TREE AND CRANE SERVICE, Opinion Delivered April 9, 2015 INC., AND ROGER WILLIAMS APPELLANTS UPON RETURN OF SPECIAL MASTER’S FINDINGS OF FACT V.

TERRI FOUGHT APPELLEE CONTEMPT CITATION ISSUED.

PER CURIAM

This matter concerns the failure of court reporter Sheila Russell to timely prepare the

record in the above-captioned case as set forth in our per curiam order of January 15, 2015.

James Tree & Crane Serv., Inc. v. Fought, 2015 Ark. 6 (per curiam). In that order, we found

that Russell had failed to comply with the writ of certiorari for the completion of the record

issued by this court, and we ordered her to appear before us on January 29, 2015, to show

cause why she should not be held in contempt for her failure to comply with the writ.

Russell did appear on the appointed date and entered a plea of not guilty. Accordingly, we

appointed the Honorable John Mauzy Pittman as special master to conduct a hearing on the

matter, to make findings of fact, and to file them with our clerk. James Tree & Crane Serv.,

Inc. v. Fought, 2015 Ark. 48 (per curiam). In a subsequent order, we directed the special

master to inquire into the status of the record preparation in Fought and any other appeals

involving Russell where the records were not completed in a timely fashion. We asked the Cite as 2015 Ark. 158

special master to ascertain and make findings as to the degree that Russell had completed the

records, whether she could be expected to complete the records in a reasonable time, or

whether it might be necessary for another certified court reporter to assume the task of

completing the records. Finally, we requested the special master to determine whether

Russell was in possession of any unearned fees, if he should find that Russell could not

complete the records within a reasonable time.

The special master held the hearing on March 13, 2015. The parties in Fought

participated in the hearing, as did the parties in the appeal of In re Estate of Fulmer v. Fulmer.

In Fulmer, we also had issued a writ of certiorari to Russell for the completion of the record.

Although our clerk received what was purportedly a complete record for that appeal, we

subsequently issued another writ of certiorari because pleadings and a transcription of a

number of hearings were omitted from the record. Fulmer, No. CV-14-1072 (Mar. 12, 2015)

(order granting writ of certiorari to supplement the record).

On March 24, 2015, the special master filed his findings of fact with our clerk. The

special master found that Russell’s failure to comply with the writ was not justified and was

contrary to her duties as an official court reporter. The special master also found that Russell

would not complete the records in the two cases, and he recommended the appointment of

another certified court reporter to assume the responsibility for completing the records. In

addition, the special master found that the appealing party in Fought had paid Russell $5,300

for one half of the estimated cost of transcription in compliance with Arkansas Code

Annotated section 16-13-510(c) (Repl. 2010).

2 Cite as 2015 Ark. 158

We accept the findings of the special master and hold Russell in contempt of this court

for willfully failing to prepare the instant record in a timely manner and in accordance with

the directive of this court. In holding Russell in contempt, we note that she may be punished

by incarceration, imposition of a fine, or both. Lauderdale v. State, 2010 Ark. 99 (per curiam);

Ross v. State, 346 Ark. 180, 55 S.W.3d 770 (2001) (per curiam). In this instance, we sentence

Russell to a term of ten days in jail and impose a fine of $500, due on or before Monday,

April 20, 2015. In addition, we order Russell to pay the costs of the special master and court

reporter for the hearing in the total sum of $1,269.80. We also order Russell to remit the

sum of $5,300 to James Tree and Crane Service, Inc., and Roger Williams. Further, so that

another certified court reporter can be appointed to complete the records, we direct Russell

to deliver to the clerk of this court all items in her possession necessary to complete the

records in Fought and Fulmer, including but not limited to all audio tapes, electronic

recordings, and physical exhibits proffered or received in evidence. Russell is ordered to

make this delivery to our clerk on or before Monday, April 20, 2015, and she is ordered to

include a typewritten inventory of all items delivered to the clerk. This court suspends

imposition of the ten-day jail sentence upon Russell’s payment of the $500 fine and the

mandated delivery of the materials to our clerk by April 20, 2015. Finally, we direct our clerk

to forward a copy of this opinion to the Board of Certified Court Reporter Examiners.

Contempt citation issued.

DANIELSON, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gene Jackson v. State of Arkansas
2024 Ark. App. 131 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 2024)
James Tree & Crane Serv. Inc. v. Fought
2015 Ark. 261 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2015 Ark. 158, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-tree-crane-serv-v-fought-2-ark-2015.