James Trading Corp. v. Dixson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

James Trading Corp. v. Dixson

236 A.D. 823

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 15, 1932

StatusPublished

This text of 236 A.D. 823 (James Trading Corp. v. Dixson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

James Trading Corp. v. Dixson, 236 A.D. 823 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment of Onondaga County Court and judgment of Syracuse Municipal Court reversed, with costs to appellant in this court and in the County Court, and motion denied on the ground that the diffuse and repetitious complaint when stripped of its irrelevancies states a cause of action to recover from the defendant moneys of the plaintiff obtained by defendant with knowledge of plaintiff’s ownership and held by him despite plaintiff’s demand therefor. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment of Onondaga County Court and judgment of Syracuse Municipal Court reversed, with costs to appellant in this court and in the County Court, and motion denied on the ground that the diffuse and repetitious complaint when stripped of its irrelevancies states a cause of action to recover from the defendant moneys of the plaintiff obtained by defendant with knowledge of plaintiff’s ownership and held by him despite plaintiff’s demand therefor. All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

236 A.D. 823, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-trading-corp-v-dixson-nyappdiv-1932.