James Todd Wagner v. Warren Mosler

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 21, 2026
Docket4D2024-1449
StatusPublished

This text of James Todd Wagner v. Warren Mosler (James Todd Wagner v. Warren Mosler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
James Todd Wagner v. Warren Mosler, (Fla. Ct. App. 2026).

Opinion

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

JAMES TODD WAGNER and SUPERCAR ENGINEERING, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellants,

v.

WARREN MOSLER and MOSLER AUTO CARE CENTER, INC. (“MACC”), a Florida corporation, d/b/a MOSLER AUTOMOTIVE, Appellees.

No. 4D2024-1449

[January 21, 2026]

Appeal and cross-appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Luis Delgado, Judge; L.T. Case No. 502012CA023358.

Scott W. Zappolo of Zappolo Law, P.A., Palm Beach Gardens, for appellants.

Steven Weber of Weber Law, P.A., Miami, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Appellants James Todd Wagner and Supercar Engineering appeal a final judgment entered in favor of appellees Warren Mosler and Mosler Auto Care Center following the appellees’ motions for directed verdict and judgment notwithstanding the verdict on all counts. The appellees cross- appeal two orders finding the appellants entitled to sanctions following the appellees’ discovery conduct. We affirm on all issues raised without further comment, except we dismiss the cross-appeal as it relates to the trial court’s 2023 order granting appellants’ motion for sanctions. This issue is not ripe for appellate review because the order merely granted entitlement to sanctions but did not determine an amount of fees and costs. Yampol v. Turnberry Isle S. Condo. Ass’n, 250 So. 3d 835, 837 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018) (“An order granting entitlement to attorney’s fees but not determining the amount of fees or costs is a non-final, non-appealable order, and such an order is subject to dismissal for lack of jurisdiction.”).

Affirmed in part; dismissed in part. CIKLIN, LEVINE and SHAW, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely-filed motion for rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Yampol v. Turnberry Isle South Condo Assoc.
250 So. 3d 835 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
James Todd Wagner v. Warren Mosler, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-todd-wagner-v-warren-mosler-fladistctapp-2026.