James Todd v. Otis Daniell

Supreme Court

James Todd v. Otis Daniell

42 U.S. 289, 11 L. Ed. 135, 1 How. 289, 1843 U.S. LEXIS 311

DecidedMarch 10, 1843

StatusPublished

This text of 42 U.S. 289 (James Todd v. Otis Daniell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

James Todd v. Otis Daniell, 42 U.S. 289, 11 L. Ed. 135, 1 How. 289, 1843 U.S. LEXIS 311 (1843).

Pincite

Opinion

An agreement in writing between the counsel, as .well for the appellant as for the appellee, that the decree of the Circuit'Court in this case shall be affirmed with legal damages and costs for the said Daniell, having been filed'; it is thereupon considered and decreed by this court, that the decree of the said Circuit Court in this cause be and the same is hereby affirmed, with costs and damages, at the rate of 6 per centum per annum; and also that the said appellee recover of the said appellant, the further sum of $125 for the-costs of the transcript of the record in the Circuit Court according to the said agreement.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

An agreement in writing between the counsel, as .well for the appellant as for the appellee, that the decree of the Circuit'Court in this case shall be affirmed with legal damages and costs for the said Daniell, having been filed'; it is thereupon considered and decreed by this court, that the decree of the said Circuit Court in this cause be and the same is hereby affirmed, with costs and damages, at the rate of 6 per centum per annum; and also that the said appellee recover of the said appellant, the further sum of $125 for the-costs of the transcript of the record in the Circuit Court according to the said agreement.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

42 U.S. 289, 11 L. Ed. 135, 1 How. 289, 1843 U.S. LEXIS 311, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-todd-v-otis-daniell-scotus-1843.