James Tinsley, IV v. State
This text of James Tinsley, IV v. State (James Tinsley, IV v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
ORDER ON APPELLANT’S MOTION FOR EN BANC RECONSIDERATION
Appellate case name: James Tinsley, IV v. The State of Texas
Appellate case number: 01-17-00296-CR
Trial court case number: 1468641
Trial court: 230th District Court of Harris County
Date motion filed: October 28, 2018
Party filing motion: Appellant, James Tinsley, IV
It is ordered that the motion for rehearing en banc is DENIED.
Judge’s signature: /s/ __Richard Hightower__________________________________________ Acting Individually Acting for the Court
En banc court consists of: Chief Justice Radack, and Justices Keyes, Higley, Lloyd, Kelly, Goodman, Landau, Hightower, and Countiss
Date: February 21, 2019
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
James Tinsley, IV v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-tinsley-iv-v-state-texapp-2019.