James Thompson & Sons, Inc. v. Castleton Contracting Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

James Thompson & Sons, Inc. v. Castleton Contracting Co.

18 A.D.2d 1109, 239 N.Y.S.2d 863, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3862

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 29, 1963

StatusPublished

This text of 18 A.D.2d 1109 (James Thompson & Sons, Inc. v. Castleton Contracting Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

James Thompson & Sons, Inc. v. Castleton Contracting Co., 18 A.D.2d 1109, 239 N.Y.S.2d 863, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3862 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action by a materialman against a contractor and its surety for materials furnished to the contractor, the surety appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, dated February 5, 1963, which denied its motion: (a) to strike the action from the non jury calendar for the January 1963 Trial Term, pursuant to the Special Rule (art. IV) of this court regulating the calendar practice of the Supreme Court in this Department; and (b) to deny plaintiff a preference under rule 10 of the Rules of the Supreme Court, Richmond County. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. (See Colprovia Asphalt Corp. v. Castleton Contr. Co., 18 A D 2d 1106, decided herewith.) Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action by a materialman against a contractor and its surety for materials furnished to the contractor, the surety appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, dated February 5, 1963, which denied its motion: (a) to strike the action from the non jury calendar for the January 1963 Trial Term, pursuant to the Special Rule (art. IV) of this court regulating the calendar practice of the Supreme Court in this Department; and (b) to deny plaintiff a preference under rule 10 of the Rules of the Supreme Court, Richmond County. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. (See Colprovia Asphalt Corp. v. Castleton Contr. Co., 18 A D 2d 1106, decided herewith.) Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

18 A.D.2d 1109, 239 N.Y.S.2d 863, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3862, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-thompson-sons-inc-v-castleton-contracting-co-nyappdiv-1963.