James Thomas LaPointe v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 16, 2009
Docket03-09-00303-CR
StatusPublished

This text of James Thomas LaPointe v. State (James Thomas LaPointe v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
James Thomas LaPointe v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN




NO. 03-09-00303-CR

James Thomas LaPointe, Appellant



v.



The State of Texas, Appellee



FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, 368TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 03-111-K368, HONORABLE BURT CARNES, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N



Appellant James Thomas La Pointe seeks to appeal a denial of his motion to recuse in a habeas proceeding. The trial court's denial of this motion cannot be appealed as an interlocutory order. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 18a(f) (denial of motion to recuse is reviewed on appeal from final judgment); Arnold v. State, 853 S.W.2d 543, 544 (Tex. Crim. App. 1993) (civil rule governing recusal motions applies in criminal cases). Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

___________________________________________

Diane M. Henson, Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Puryear and Henson

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: June 16, 2009

Do Not Publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Arnold v. State
853 S.W.2d 543 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
James Thomas LaPointe v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-thomas-lapointe-v-state-texapp-2009.