James Thomas LaPointe v. State
This text of James Thomas LaPointe v. State (James Thomas LaPointe v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-09-00303-CR
James Thomas LaPointe, Appellant
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, 368TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
NO. 03-111-K368, HONORABLE BURT CARNES, JUDGE PRESIDING
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
Appellant James Thomas La Pointe seeks to appeal a denial of his motion to recuse in a habeas proceeding. The trial court's denial of this motion cannot be appealed as an interlocutory order. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 18a(f) (denial of motion to recuse is reviewed on appeal from final judgment); Arnold v. State, 853 S.W.2d 543, 544 (Tex. Crim. App. 1993) (civil rule governing recusal motions applies in criminal cases). Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
___________________________________________
Diane M. Henson, Justice
Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Puryear and Henson
Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction
Filed: June 16, 2009
Do Not Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
James Thomas LaPointe v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-thomas-lapointe-v-state-texapp-2009.