James Talcott, Inc. v. Honorable Frank M. Scarlett, Judge, United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia, Savannah, Georgia

Fifth Circuit

James Talcott, Inc. v. Honorable Frank M. Scarlett, Judge, United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia, Savannah, Georgia

375 F.2d 776, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 6717

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedApril 17, 1967

Docket24334_1

StatusPublished

This text of 375 F.2d 776 (James Talcott, Inc. v. Honorable Frank M. Scarlett, Judge, United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia, Savannah, Georgia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

James Talcott, Inc. v. Honorable Frank M. Scarlett, Judge, United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia, Savannah, Georgia, 375 F.2d 776, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 6717 (5th Cir. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

It appearing in this application for writ of mandamus that the respondent, Honorable Frank M. Scarlett, has entered an order for a new trial on a ground which was not urged by the losing party in the litigation in the trial court, but on a ground that a careful study of the record clearly indicates warranted the grant of new trial, and the grant or denial of a petition for extraordinary writ of mandamus being addressed to the discretion of this court, we conclude that the application should and the same is hereby

Denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

It appearing in this application for writ of mandamus that the respondent, Honorable Frank M. Scarlett, has entered an order for a new trial on a ground which was not urged by the losing party in the litigation in the trial court, but on a ground that a careful study of the record clearly indicates warranted the grant of new trial, and the grant or denial of a petition for extraordinary writ of mandamus being addressed to the discretion of this court, we conclude that the application should and the same is hereby

Denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

375 F.2d 776, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 6717, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-talcott-inc-v-honorable-frank-m-scarlett-judge-united-states-ca5-1967.