James T. Ross v. Arnold Hopkins, Commissioner of Corrections
This text of 836 F.2d 1343 (James T. Ross v. Arnold Hopkins, Commissioner of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
836 F.2d 1343
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
James T. ROSS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Arnold HOPKINS, Commissioner of Corrections, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 87-7334.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Nov. 30, 1987.
Decided Jan. 8, 1988.
James T. Ross, appellant pro se.
Before JAMES DICKSON PHILLIPS, MURNAGHAN, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal from its order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. Ross v. Hopkins, C/A No. 87-2182-B (D.Md. Aug. 30, 1987).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
836 F.2d 1343, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 125, 1988 WL 1093, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-t-ross-v-arnold-hopkins-commissioner-of-corrections-ca4-1988.