James T. Kearney, Jr. v. John W. MacY Jr., and U.S.A.

Ninth Circuit

James T. Kearney, Jr. v. John W. MacY Jr., and U.S.A.

409 F.2d 847, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 12659

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided April 25, 1969·No. 23327_1·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The motion of appellee for summary affirmance is granted on the authority of United Public Workers of America v. Mitchell, 1947, 330 U.S. 75, 67 S.Ct. 556, 91 L.Ed. 754. In our opinion, that case, insofar as it deals with an employee of the United States government such as appellant Kearney, and with a violation of the Hatch Act of the type that Kearney was found to have committed, has not been overruled either expressly or by implication by subsequent decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The motion of appellee for summary affirmance is granted on the authority of United Public Workers of America v. Mitchell, 1947, 330 U.S. 75, 67 S.Ct. 556, 91 L.Ed. 754. In our opinion, that case, insofar as it deals with an employee of the United States government such as appellant Kearney, and with a violation of the Hatch Act of the type that Kearney was found to have committed, has not been overruled either expressly or by implication by subsequent decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States.

Affirmed.

James T. Kearney, Jr. v. John W. MacY Jr., and U.S.A., 409 F.2d 847, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 12659 (9th Cir. 1969).

Pincite

409 F.2d 847 (James T. Kearney, Jr. v. John W. MacY Jr., and U.S.A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related