James T. Kearney, Jr. v. John W. MacY Jr., and U.S.A.

Ninth Circuit

James T. Kearney, Jr. v. John W. MacY Jr., and U.S.A.

409 F.2d 847, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 12659

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedApril 25, 1969

Docket23327_1

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 409 F.2d 847 (James T. Kearney, Jr. v. John W. MacY Jr., and U.S.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

James T. Kearney, Jr. v. John W. MacY Jr., and U.S.A., 409 F.2d 847, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 12659 (9th Cir. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The motion of appellee for summary affirmance is granted on the authority of United Public Workers of America v. Mitchell, 1947, 330 U.S. 75, 67 S.Ct. 556, 91 L.Ed. 754. In our opinion, that case, insofar as it deals with an employee of the United States government such as appellant Kearney, and with a violation of the Hatch Act of the type that Kearney was found to have committed, has not been overruled either expressly or by implication by subsequent decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The motion of appellee for summary affirmance is granted on the authority of United Public Workers of America v. Mitchell, 1947, 330 U.S. 75, 67 S.Ct. 556, 91 L.Ed. 754. In our opinion, that case, insofar as it deals with an employee of the United States government such as appellant Kearney, and with a violation of the Hatch Act of the type that Kearney was found to have committed, has not been overruled either expressly or by implication by subsequent decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

409 F.2d 847, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 12659, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-t-kearney-jr-v-john-w-macy-jr-and-usa-ca9-1969.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack