James T. Ingram, W v. State of Florida
This text of James T. Ingram, W v. State of Florida (James T. Ingram, W v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
JAMES T. INGRAM, Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.
No. 4D2025-0929
[July 2, 2025]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Martin S. Fein, Judge; L.T. Case No. 03-019684-CF10A.
David M. Lamos of the Law Offices of David M. Lamos, Fort Pierce, for appellant.
No appearance required for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Wainwright v. State, No. SC2025-0708, --- So. 3d ---, 2025 WL 1561151, *5-*6 (Fla. June 3, 2025) (holding that, even if Erlinger v. United States, 602 U.S. 821 (2024), constitutes a change in law, it does not apply retroactively to cases that were final when it was decided).
WARNER, LEVINE and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
James T. Ingram, W v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-t-ingram-w-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2025.