James T. Ingram, W v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 2, 2025·No. 4D2025-0929·Published

Opinion

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

JAMES T. INGRAM, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

No. 4D2025-0929

[July 2, 2025]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Martin S. Fein, Judge; L.T. Case No. 03-019684-CF10A.

David M. Lamos of the Law Offices of David M. Lamos, Fort Pierce, for appellant.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Wainwright v. State, No. SC2025-0708, --- So. 3d ---, 2025 WL 1561151, *5-*6 (Fla. June 3, 2025) (holding that, even if Erlinger v. United States, 602 U.S. 821 (2024), constitutes a change in law, it does not apply retroactively to cases that were final when it was decided).

WARNER, LEVINE and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

James T. Ingram, W v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2025).

James T. Ingram, W v. State of Florida (James T. Ingram, W v. State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Erlinger v. United States
602 U.S. 821 (Supreme Court, 2024)