James T. Ingram, W v. State of Florida
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
JAMES T. INGRAM, Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.
No. 4D2025-0929
[July 2, 2025]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Martin S. Fein, Judge; L.T. Case No. 03-019684-CF10A.
David M. Lamos of the Law Offices of David M. Lamos, Fort Pierce, for appellant.
No appearance required for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Wainwright v. State, No. SC2025-0708, --- So. 3d ---, 2025 WL 1561151, *5-*6 (Fla. June 3, 2025) (holding that, even if Erlinger v. United States, 602 U.S. 821 (2024), constitutes a change in law, it does not apply retroactively to cases that were final when it was decided).
WARNER, LEVINE and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
James T. Ingram, W v. State of Florida (James T. Ingram, W v. State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.