James Sutika v. Roscommon County Clerk
This text of James Sutika v. Roscommon County Clerk (James Sutika v. Roscommon County Clerk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
March 9, 2017 Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice
Robert P. Young, Jr. Brian K. Zahra 155416 & (24)(25) Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein Joan L. Larsen, Justices JAMES SUTIKA, Plaintiff-Appellee, SC: 155416 v COA: 337144 Roscommon CC: 16-723378-AS ROSCOMMON COUNTY CLERK, Defendant-Appellant.
_________________________________________/
On order of the Court, the motions for immediate consideration and to expedite are GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal prior to decision by the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the Court is not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court before consideration by the Court of Appeals. However, we ORDER the Court of Appeals to expedite its consideration of this case.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. March 9, 2017 T0309 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
James Sutika v. Roscommon County Clerk, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-sutika-v-roscommon-county-clerk-mich-2017.