James Striblin v. the State of Texas

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 8, 2022
Docket04-22-00116-CR
StatusPublished

This text of James Striblin v. the State of Texas (James Striblin v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
James Striblin v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas March 8, 2022

No. 04-22-00116-CR

James STRIBLIN, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2013CR4270 Honorable Sid L. Harle, Judge Presiding

ORDER Appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal from an order denying his motion to recuse the trial court judge who presided over the proceedings that resulted in appellant’s 2017 convictions. An order denying a motion to recuse is not a final, appealable order; it may be reviewed only in an appeal from a final judgment. Green v. State, 374 S.W.3d 434, 445 (Tex. Crim. App. 2012). An appeal of the decision to deny a motion to recuse, standing alone, would be improper. Id. Here, appellant is not challenging the order in an appeal from the final judgments in his underlying criminal cases. Also, it appears the order from which appellant attempts to appeal arises from a post- conviction request for relief. Texas Code of Criminal Procedure article 11.07 vests complete jurisdiction over post-conviction relief from final felony convictions in the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, §§ 3, 5; Bd. of Pardons & Paroles ex rel. Keene v. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Dist., 910 S.W.2d 481, 484 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995) (per curiam). There is no role for the intermediate courts of appeals in the procedure under Article 11.07. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, § 3; Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals, 802 S.W.2d 241, 243 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991) (orig. proceeding). For the above reasons, it appears we do not have jurisdiction to entertain this appeal. Therefore, appellant is ORDERED to show cause in writing, no later than March 22, 2022, why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. All appellate deadlines are suspended until further order of the court. _________________________________ Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 8th day of March, 2022.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals
802 S.W.2d 241 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1991)
Board of Pardons & Paroles Ex Rel. Keene v. Court of Appeals for the Eighth District
910 S.W.2d 481 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1995)
Green, Jonathan Marcus
374 S.W.3d 434 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
James Striblin v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-striblin-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2022.