James Sterling Ostrander v. State of Texas

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 28, 2010
Docket11-10-00271-CR
StatusPublished

This text of James Sterling Ostrander v. State of Texas (James Sterling Ostrander v. State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
James Sterling Ostrander v. State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

Order filed October 28, 2010

                                                                       In The

  Eleventh Court of Appeals

                                                                   __________

                                                         No. 11-10-00271-CR

                        JAMES STERLING OSTRANDER, Appellant

                                                             V.

                                      STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

                                   On Appeal from the 266th District Court

                                                            Erath County, Texas

                                                   Trial Court Cause No. CR13268

                                                                     O R D E R

            James Sterling Ostrander has filed in this court a pro se motion to present his case.  In his motion, appellant states that he has been unable to contact his court-appointed counsel and that he has material that he desires to forward to this court.

            The appeal is abated, and the trial court is directed to conduct a hearing to determine if the appointment of subsequent counsel is required.  If it is determined that appellant is indigent and is exercising his right to represent himself, the trial court must develop evidence as to whether appellant’s decision to proceed without counsel is knowingly and intelligently made and enter findings of fact and conclusions of law.  Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806 (1975); Ex parte Davis, 818 S.W.2d 64 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991); Hubbard v. State, 739 S.W.2d 341 (Tex. Crim. App. 1987); Webb v. State, 533 S.W.2d 780 (Tex. Crim. App. 1976).

            The clerk of the trial court is directed to prepare and forward to this court a supplemental clerk’s record containing the findings and orders of the trial court.  In the event a hearing is conducted, the court reporter is directed to prepare and forward to this court a supplemental reporter’s record from the hearing.  The supplemental records are due to be filed in this court on or before November 15, 2010.

            The appeal is abated.  Upon the filing of the supplemental records, the appeal will be reinstated.

                                                                                    PER CURIAM

October 28, 2010

Do not publish.  See Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

Panel consists of:  Wright, C.J.,

McCall, J., and Strange, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Faretta v. California
422 U.S. 806 (Supreme Court, 1975)
Ex Parte Davis
818 S.W.2d 64 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1991)
Webb v. State
533 S.W.2d 780 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1976)
Hubbard v. State
739 S.W.2d 341 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
James Sterling Ostrander v. State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-sterling-ostrander-v-state-of-texas-texapp-2010.