James Spear Stove & Heating Co. v. General Electric Co.

Third Circuit

James Spear Stove & Heating Co. v. General Electric Co.

80 F.2d 1012, 1935 U.S. App. LEXIS 3439

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedOctober 15, 1935

DocketNo. 5726

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 80 F.2d 1012 (James Spear Stove & Heating Co. v. General Electric Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

James Spear Stove & Heating Co. v. General Electric Co., 80 F.2d 1012, 1935 U.S. App. LEXIS 3439 (3d Cir. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

At’the close of the trial of the action of deceit here involved, the trial judge granted a peremptory nonsuit and subsequently refused to take the same off. Thereupon the plaintiff took this appeal.

The case depends on its own particular proofs, all of which are fully stated and carefully discussed by the judge below in his justifying opinion. The case has had our careful consideration, with the result that we find no error in the granting of the nonsuit. Adopting, therefore, as the opinion of this court the reasoning and conclusions. of the trial judge, as set forth in his opinion, 12 F.Supp. 977, the judgment below is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

At’the close of the trial of the action of deceit here involved, the trial judge granted a peremptory nonsuit and subsequently refused to take the same off. Thereupon the plaintiff took this appeal.

The case depends on its own particular proofs, all of which are fully stated and carefully discussed by the judge below in his justifying opinion. The case has had our careful consideration, with the result that we find no error in the granting of the nonsuit. Adopting, therefore, as the opinion of this court the reasoning and conclusions. of the trial judge, as set forth in his opinion, 12 F.Supp. 977, the judgment below is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

80 F.2d 1012, 1935 U.S. App. LEXIS 3439, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-spear-stove-heating-co-v-general-electric-co-ca3-1935.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack