James Smith v. Royal Oak Township

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided January 18, 2013·No. 145963·Published

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

January 18, 2013 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

145963 Michael F. Cavanagh Stephen J. Markman Diane M. Hathaway Mary Beth Kelly Brian K. Zahra JAMES SMITH and ODIS SOLOMON, Bridget M. McCormack, Plaintiffs-Appellants, Justices and JOHN GATEWOOD, Plaintiff, v SC: 145963 COA: 303939 Oakland CC: 2010-113507-CK ROYAL OAK TOWNSHIP, Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 28, 2012 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

HATHAWAY, J., not participating.

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. January 18, 2013 _________________________________________ t0116 Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

James Smith v. Royal Oak Township, (Mich. 2013).

James Smith v. Royal Oak Township (James Smith v. Royal Oak Township) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.