James Skoda and Michael Callahan v. Carl Fontani

646 F.2d 1193, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 14132
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
DecidedApril 20, 1981
Docket80-2465
StatusPublished
Cited by22 cases

This text of 646 F.2d 1193 (James Skoda and Michael Callahan v. Carl Fontani) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
James Skoda and Michael Callahan v. Carl Fontani, 646 F.2d 1193, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 14132 (7th Cir. 1981).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The district court denied plaintiff’s request for attorney’s fees under 42 U.S.C. § 1988. We reverse and remand.

Plaintiffs won a jury verdict of only one dollar in their civil rights action against defendant. Although this may be considered a small victory, plaintiffs did win a verdict in their favor. They are thus the prevailing parties under 42 U.S.C. § 1988, contrary to the district court’s conclusion.

The district court here did not articulate any “special circumstances” which would render any award of fees unjust. Newman v. Piggie Park Enterprises, Inc., 390 U.S. 400, 88 S.Ct. 964, 19 L.Ed.2d 1263 (1968). Nor did the court consider the appropriate amount of the award, since it ruled that plaintiffs did not prevail.

In Murphy v. Kolovitz, 635 F.2d 662 (7th Cir. 1981), and Muscare v. Quinn, 614 F.2d 577 (7th Cir. 1980), we set forth rules to guide the court’s discretion in deciding what fee award, if any, is appropriate. See also Coop v. City of South Bend, 635 F.2d 652 (7th Cir. 1980). On remand, the district court should consider whether any special circumstances exist, and if not, should decide the appropriate amount of the fee award in light of these decisions.

The order of the district court is REVERSED AND REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Domegan v. Ponte
First Circuit, 1992
Dennis J. Domegan v. Joseph Ponte, (Two Cases)
972 F.2d 401 (First Circuit, 1992)
Rhodes v. Stewart
488 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1988)
Stefan v. Laurenitis
695 F. Supp. 1330 (D. Massachusetts, 1988)
Nephew v. City of Aurora ex rel. Mayor
830 F.2d 1547 (Tenth Circuit, 1987)
Evans v. Jeff D. Ex Rel. Johnson
475 U.S. 717 (Supreme Court, 1986)
Moran v. Pima County
474 U.S. 989 (Supreme Court, 1985)
Johnny Smith v. Major Debartoli
769 F.2d 451 (Seventh Circuit, 1985)
Nephew v. City of Aurora
766 F.2d 1464 (Tenth Circuit, 1985)
Perkins v. Cross
562 F. Supp. 85 (E.D. Arkansas, 1983)
Harceg v. Brown
536 F. Supp. 125 (N.D. Illinois, 1982)
Skoda v. Fontani
519 F. Supp. 309 (N.D. Illinois, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
646 F.2d 1193, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 14132, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-skoda-and-michael-callahan-v-carl-fontani-ca7-1981.