James Shewan & Sons, Inc. v. Union Sulphur Co.

139 Misc. 860, 249 N.Y.S. 518, 1931 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1251
New York Supreme Court·Decided January 11, 1931·Published

Opinion

Faber, J.

Defendant’s motion for retaxation of costs denied, with ten dollars costs. The judgment for $15,360.93 was reversed by the Appellate Division because it included interest on the [861]*861amount of verdict, which had not been included by the jury, but added by the court. The reversal was “ with costs to appellant to abide the event.” On the second trial interest was included by the jury and the resultant judgment was $16,013.58. The effect of the quoted words was to give the costs of the appeal to the appellant depending upon the event of the second trial. (Howell v. Van Sicklen, 8 Hun, 524; affd., 70 N. Y. 595.) The second trial resulting in the recovery of a larger judgment because of the inclusion of interest as part of the damages (Walrath v. Redfield, 18 N. Y. 457; Parrott v. Knickerbocker Ice Co., 46 id. 361), the event was that plaintiff was the prevailing party and entitled to costs of both trials. (Belt v. American Central Ins. Co., 33 App. Div. 239.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

James Shewan & Sons, Inc. v. Union Sulphur Co., 139 Misc. 860, 249 N.Y.S. 518, 1931 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1251 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1931).

139 Misc. 860 (James Shewan & Sons, Inc. v. Union Sulphur Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Howell v. Van Sicklen
70 N.Y. 595 (New York Court of Appeals, 1877)
Walrath v. Redfield.
18 N.Y. 457 (New York Court of Appeals, 1858)
Belt v. American Central Insurance
33 A.D. 239 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1898)