James Seth Hicks v. lndyMac Mortgage Services, a Division of OneWest Bank, FSB

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided January 9, 2013·No. 03-12-00297-CV·Published

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-12-00297-CV

James Seth Hicks, Appellant

v.

IndyMac Mortgage Services, a division of OneWest Bank, FSB, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 353RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-1-GN-10-000327, HONORABLE RHONDA HURLEY, JUDGE PRESIDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant’s brief was due on November 5, 2012. On December 10, 2012, this Court

notified appellant that his brief was overdue and that a failure to respond by December 20, 2012,

would result in the dismissal of this appeal for want of prosecution. To date, appellant has not filed a

brief or a motion for extension of time. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution.

See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a); 42.3(b).

__________________________________________

Scott K. Field, Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Goodwin and Field

Dismissed for Want of Prosecution

Filed: January 9, 2013

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

James Seth Hicks v. lndyMac Mortgage Services, a Division of OneWest Bank, FSB, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

James Seth Hicks v. lndyMac Mortgage Services, a Division of OneWest Bank, FSB (James Seth Hicks v. lndyMac Mortgage Services, a Division of OneWest Bank, FSB) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.