James Schmidt v. Attorney Grievance Commission
This text of James Schmidt v. Attorney Grievance Commission (James Schmidt v. Attorney Grievance Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Clifford W. Taylor, July 2, 2008 Chief Justice
Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, 136739 & (3) Justices
JAMES SCHMIDT,
Plaintiff,
v SC: 136739 AGC: 1288/04 ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION, Defendant. _________________________________________/ On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The complaint for superintending control is considered, and relief is DENIED, because the Court is not persuaded that it should grant the requested relief.
I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. July 2, 2008 _________________________________________ p0701 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
James Schmidt v. Attorney Grievance Commission, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-schmidt-v-attorney-grievance-commission-mich-2008.