James Sanders Alice Sanders v. Heilig-Meyers Furniture Company, (Sterchi's)

889 F.2d 1088, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 17465, 1989 WL 139474
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedNovember 20, 1989
Docket89-6261
StatusUnpublished

This text of 889 F.2d 1088 (James Sanders Alice Sanders v. Heilig-Meyers Furniture Company, (Sterchi's)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
James Sanders Alice Sanders v. Heilig-Meyers Furniture Company, (Sterchi's), 889 F.2d 1088, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 17465, 1989 WL 139474 (6th Cir. 1989).

Opinion

889 F.2d 1088

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
James SANDERS; Alice Sanders, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
HEILIG-MEYERS FURNITURE COMPANY, (STERCHI'S), Defendant-Appellee.

No. 89-6261.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Nov. 20, 1989.

Before KRUPANSKY and RYAN, Circuit Judges, and EDWARD H. JOHNSTONE, Chief District Judge*.

ORDER

This appeal has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 9(a), Ru les of the Sixth Circuit.

A review of the record indicates that the final order of the district court was entered August 31, 1989. A Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) motion for reconsideration was served on September 11, 1989, within ten days of entry of judgment and tolled t he appeals period. See Fed.R.App.P. 4(a)(4). The September 29, 1989, notice o f appeal filed prior to the ruling on the Rule 59(e) motion is premature. Fed. R.App.P. 4(a)(4) provides that a notice of appeal filed before the disposition of a timely Rule 59(e) motion "shall have no effect. A new notice of appeal mu st be filed within the prescribed time measured from the entry of the order dis posing of the motion...." A timely notice of appeal is mandatory and jurisdict ional. Osterneck v. Ernst & Whinney, 109 S.Ct. 987, 990 (1989); Griggs v. Pro vident Consumer Discount Co., 459 U.S. 56, 61 (1982) (per curiam).

It is ORDERED that the appeal be, and it hereby is, dismissed for lack of juris diction. Rule 8(b)(1), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

*

The Honorable Edward H. Johnstone, Chief U.S. District Judge for the Western District of Kentucky, sitting by designation

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co.
459 U.S. 56 (Supreme Court, 1982)
Osterneck v. Ernst & Whinney
489 U.S. 169 (Supreme Court, 1989)
Savage (Leo Victor) v. United States
889 F.2d 1088 (Sixth Circuit, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
889 F.2d 1088, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 17465, 1989 WL 139474, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-sanders-alice-sanders-v-heilig-meyers-furniture-company-sterchis-ca6-1989.