James S. Pacheco v. Matthew Carberry

Ninth Circuit

James S. Pacheco v. Matthew Carberry

389 F.2d 93

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 16, 1968

Docket21669

StatusPublished

This text of 389 F.2d 93 (James S. Pacheco v. Matthew Carberry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

James S. Pacheco v. Matthew Carberry, 389 F.2d 93 (9th Cir. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Appellant’s petition for a writ of habe-as corpus was dismissed in the district court. He appeals.

One of his points is appropriate for decision here now. That is his attack on the state search warrant and the fruits thereof. We find the warrant on the facts here not infirm, but valid under United States v. Ventresca, 380 U.S. 102, 85 S.Ct. 741, 13 L.Ed.2d 684.

As to all other points raised here, we find Pacheco has not exhausted his state remedies.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI