James S. Holder and Louise H. Holder v. United States

412 F.2d 1189, 24 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5394, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 11282

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The issues presented in this case have been fully decided adversely to the appellant, United States of America, in Kurzner v. United States, 5 Cir. 1969, 413 F.2d 97. 1

The judgment of the District Court is

Affirmed.

1 . Pursuant to new Rule 18 of the Rules of this Court, we have concluded on the merits that this case is of such character as not to justify oral argument and have directed the clerk to place the case on the Summary Calendar and to notify the parties in writing. See Murphy v. Houma Well Service, 5 Cir. 1969, 409 F.2d 804, Part I.