James S. Holder and Louise H. Holder v. United States

412 F.2d 1189, 24 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5394, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 11282
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJuly 30, 1969
Docket26747_1
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 412 F.2d 1189 (James S. Holder and Louise H. Holder v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
James S. Holder and Louise H. Holder v. United States, 412 F.2d 1189, 24 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5394, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 11282 (5th Cir. 1969).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The issues presented in this case have been fully decided adversely to the appellant, United States of America, in Kurzner v. United States, 5 Cir. 1969, 413 F.2d 97. 1

The judgment of the District Court is

Affirmed.

1

. Pursuant to new Rule 18 of the Rules of this Court, we have concluded on the merits that this case is of such character as not to justify oral argument and have directed the clerk to place the case on the Summary Calendar and to notify the parties in writing. See Murphy v. Houma Well Service, 5 Cir. 1969, 409 F.2d 804, Part I.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Richlands Medical Ass'n v. Comm'r
1990 T.C. Memo. 660 (U.S. Tax Court, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
412 F.2d 1189, 24 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5394, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 11282, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-s-holder-and-louise-h-holder-v-united-states-ca5-1969.