James S. Day, Jr. v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida

James S. Day, Jr. v. State of Florida

183 So. 3d 467, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 722, 2016 WL 231500

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 20, 2016

Docket4D15-297

StatusPublished

This text of 183 So. 3d 467 (James S. Day, Jr. v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

James S. Day, Jr. v. State of Florida, 183 So. 3d 467, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 722, 2016 WL 231500 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

James Day appeals an order summarily denying a successive rule 3.850 motion and sanctioning him for frivolous filing. We affirm the summary denial of his postcon-viction motion, but reverse and remand the sanction order for the trial court to follow the procedure in rule 3.85Q(n) before imposing a sanction. ■

Affirmed in part and reversed in part, and remanded with instructions.

CIKLIN, C.J., TAYLOR and CONNER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

James Day appeals an order summarily denying a successive rule 3.850 motion and sanctioning him for frivolous filing. We affirm the summary denial of his postcon-viction motion, but reverse and remand the sanction order for the trial court to follow the procedure in rule 3.85Q(n) before imposing a sanction. ■

Affirmed in part and reversed in part, and remanded with instructions.

CIKLIN, C.J., TAYLOR and CONNER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

183 So. 3d 467, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 722, 2016 WL 231500, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-s-day-jr-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2016.