James Robert Taylor v. United States
This text of 226 F.2d 337 (James Robert Taylor v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This proceeding was filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, to vacate the sentence imposed on appellant upon his conviction on a narcotics charge. The main ground urged is that he was denied his right to the effective assistance of counsel, as guaranteed under the Sixth Amendment. Counsel on this appeal were appointed by the District Court and were not appellant’s trial counsel.
We think the motion, under the particular circumstances of the case, should have been granted.
Reversed and remanded with directions to vacate the sentence and award a new trial.
I would remand the Section 2255 proceeding to the District Court for a finding, after an evidentiary hearing, including both oral testimony and cross-examination, whether Taylor knew at the time he employed counsel that these counsel represented Monroe. See United States v. Hayman, 1952, 342 U.S. 205, 72 S.Ct. 263, 96 L.Ed. 232.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
226 F.2d 337, 96 U.S. App. D.C. 379, 1955 U.S. App. LEXIS 3063, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-robert-taylor-v-united-states-cadc-1955.