James Richardson v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Texas Department of Corrections

453 F.2d 750, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 6661
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in James Richardson v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Texas Department of Corrections. Read the opinion of the Court — 472 F.2d 169
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided December 10, 1971·No. 71-2254·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The District Court denied Richardson, a state prisoner, the writ of habeas corpus. The denial of a previous petition was affirmed, Richardson v. State of Texas, 5 Cir., 1970, 425 F.2d 1372. There is no material difference between the instant petition and that considered by this Court on the prior appeal. Such differences as do exist are plainly without merit. 1

Under Local Rule 21 2 the judgment is

Affirmed.

1

. The new complaint, raised on this petition, alleges denial of counsel during a line-up.

2

. See NLRB v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 5 Cir., 1970, 430 F. 2d 966.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

James Richardson v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Texas Department of Corrections, 453 F.2d 750, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 6661 (5th Cir. 1971).

453 F.2d 750 (James Richardson v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Texas Department of Corrections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related