James Richard McCammon Jr. v. United States
This text of 390 F.2d 870 (James Richard McCammon Jr. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant attacks his Dyer Act convictions obtained on June 29, 1964, on the ground that the pleas of guilty entered therein were not free and voluntary. Title 18, Rule 11, Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.
This contention is refuted by appellant’s own testimony as well as the testimony of others and by the files and records of the case.
The district court’s findings made after an evidentiary hearing, held out of an abundance of caution, were clearly correct. Davis v. United States, 5 Cir., 1967, 386 F.2d 837 [1967]; Helpman v. United States, 5 Cir., 1967, 373 F.2d 401; Barrett v. United States, 5 Cir., 1961, 302 F.2d 151; Snipe v. United States, 9 Cir., 1965, 343 F.2d 25, cer-tiorari denied 86 S.Ct. 440, 382 U.S. 960, 15 L.Ed.2d 363.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
390 F.2d 870, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 7874, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-richard-mccammon-jr-v-united-states-ca5-1968.