James Reece v. City of San Marcos
This text of James Reece v. City of San Marcos (James Reece v. City of San Marcos) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 2, 2023
NO. 03-23-00088-CV
James Reece, Appellant
v.
City of San Marcos, Appellee
APPEAL FROM THE 274TH DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES BAKER, TRIANA AND SMITH DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION -- OPINION BY JUSTICE TRIANA
This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court on September 30, 2022. Having
reviewed the record, the Court holds that James Reece has not prosecuted his appeal and did not
comply with a notice from the Clerk of this Court. Therefore, the Court dismisses the appeal for
want of prosecution. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of
costs is made.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
James Reece v. City of San Marcos, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-reece-v-city-of-san-marcos-texapp-2023.