James Randall Permenter v. Kimberly Bariley Schultz

District Court of Appeal of Florida

James Randall Permenter v. Kimberly Bariley Schultz

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 5, 2017

Docket17-0993

StatusPublished

This text of James Randall Permenter v. Kimberly Bariley Schultz (James Randall Permenter v. Kimberly Bariley Schultz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

James Randall Permenter v. Kimberly Bariley Schultz, (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

JAMES RANDALL NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO PERMENTER, FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED Petitioner, CASE NO. 1D17-0993 v.

KIMBERLY BARILEY SCHULTZ,

Respondent. ___________________________/

Opinion filed June 6, 2017.

Petition for Writ of Mandamus -- Original Jurisdiction

James Randall Permenter, pro se, Petitioner.

No response for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Smartt v. First Union Nat’l

Bank, 771 So. 2d 1232 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000).

WETHERELL, RAY, and MAKAR, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI