James Randall Downs v. the State of Texas

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 21, 2023
Docket08-23-00275-CR
StatusPublished

This text of James Randall Downs v. the State of Texas (James Randall Downs v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
James Randall Downs v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2023).

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS

JAMES RANDALL DOWNS, § No. 08-23-00275-CR

Appellant, § Appeal from the

v. § 143rd Judicial District Court

THE STATE OF TEXAS, § of Ward County, Texas

Appellee. § (TC# 08-05-04962-CRW)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This appeal is before the Court on its own motion to determine whether the appeal should

be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Finding that Appellant James Randall Downs did not timely

file his notice of appeal, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Appellant filed his notice of appeal in this Court on November 3, 2023, wherein he

indicated he sought to appeal the judgment of conviction rendered against him in trial court cause

number 08-05-04962-CRW. The judgment of conviction, which he now seeks to appeal, reflects

that sentence was imposed on January 28, 2009. On November 3, 2023, the Clerk of this Court

sent Appellant a letter notifying him that it appeared to the Court that the notice of appeal was not

timely perfected. The letter further gave notice of our intention to dismiss the appeal for want of

jurisdiction, after ten days, unless grounds were shown for the Court to continue the appeal. As of the date of this opinion, more than ten days have passed, and Appellant has not filed a response to

our notice.

The notice of appeal was not timely filed, meaning that this Court does not have jurisdiction

to entertain a direct appeal from his conviction at this point in time. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)

(requiring the filing of a notice of appeal within 30 days after a sentence is imposed in open court).

To the extent Appellant is requesting the remedy of an out-of-time appeal, only the Texas Court

of Criminal Appeals has jurisdiction to grant Appellant an out-of-time appeal. See Ater v. Eighth

Court of Appeals, 802 S.W.2d 241 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991) (en banc) (explaining that writ of

habeas corpus pursuant to Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure governs out-of-

time appeals).

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.

GINA M. PALAFOX, Justice

November 21, 2023

Before Palafox, J., Soto, J., and Marion, C.J. (Ret.) Marion, C.J. (Ret.) (Sitting by Assignment)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals
802 S.W.2d 241 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
James Randall Downs v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-randall-downs-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2023.