James Ramey, Sean Ramey and All Occupants v. Bank of New York
Opinion
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed March 27, 2012
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-11-00992-CV
JAMES RAMEY, SEAN RAMEY AND ALL OCCUPANTS, Appellants V.
BANK OF NEW YORK, Appellee
On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 1 Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 860916
MEMORANDUM OPINION
This is an attempted appeal from an order denying a motion to stay writ of possession. Generally, appeals may be taken only from final judgments. Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). Interlocutory orders may be appealed only if permitted by statute. Bally Total Fitness Corp. v. Jackson, 53 S.W.3d 352, 352 (Tex. 2001); Jack B. Anglin Co., Inc. v. Tipps, 842 S.W.2d 266, 272 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding).
The record in this appeal contains no final judgment. An order denying a motion to stay writ of possession is not a final judgment, and is not one of those appealable interlocutory orders listed in section 51.014. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 51.014.1
On February 28, 2012, appellee filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. Appellants did not file a response.
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Seymore, Brown, and Boyce.
1 Certain additional appealable interlocutory orders are set forth in the Texas Family Code and Texas Probate Code, but they are not applicable to the instant order.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
James Ramey, Sean Ramey and All Occupants v. Bank of New York (James Ramey, Sean Ramey and All Occupants v. Bank of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.