James Radcliffe & Sons Co. v. Knoble

Supreme Court of New Jersey

James Radcliffe & Sons Co. v. Knoble

163 A. 665, 112 N.J. Eq. 90, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 923

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided January 5, 1933·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The order appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Bigelow, and reported in 109 N. J. Eq. 309, sub nom. James Radcliffe, &c., Sons Co. v. Borough of Hawthorne.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Brogan, ECeher, Van Buskirk, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, Kerney, JJ. 16.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The order appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Bigelow, and reported in 109 N. J. Eq. 309, sub nom. James Radcliffe, &c., Sons Co. v. Borough of Hawthorne.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Brogan, ECeher, Van Buskirk, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, Kerney, JJ. 16.

For reversal — None.

James Radcliffe & Sons Co. v. Knoble, 163 A. 665, 112 N.J. Eq. 90, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 923 (N.J. 1933).

Pincite

163 A. 665 (James Radcliffe & Sons Co. v. Knoble) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.