James Radcliffe & Sons Co. v. Knoble

Supreme Court of New Jersey

James Radcliffe & Sons Co. v. Knoble

163 A. 665, 112 N.J. Eq. 90, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 923

DecidedJanuary 5, 1933

StatusPublished

This text of 163 A. 665 (James Radcliffe & Sons Co. v. Knoble) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

James Radcliffe & Sons Co. v. Knoble, 163 A. 665, 112 N.J. Eq. 90, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 923 (N.J. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The order appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Bigelow, and reported in 109 N. J. Eq. 309, sub nom. James Radcliffe, &c., Sons Co. v. Borough of Hawthorne.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Brogan, ECeher, Van Buskirk, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, Kerney, JJ. 16.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The order appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Bigelow, and reported in 109 N. J. Eq. 309, sub nom. James Radcliffe, &c., Sons Co. v. Borough of Hawthorne.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Brogan, ECeher, Van Buskirk, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, Kerney, JJ. 16.

For reversal — None.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

163 A. 665, 112 N.J. Eq. 90, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 923, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-radcliffe-sons-co-v-knoble-nj-1933.