James R. Walker v. State of North Carolina and City of Charlotte
This text of 372 F.2d 129 (James R. Walker v. State of North Carolina and City of Charlotte) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this habeas corpus proceeding, Walker attacks a conditionally suspended sentence imposed upon him for a deliberate violation of a building code. He asserts uneonstitutionality of the relevant statutes of North Carolina and the applicable sections of Charlotte’s Housing Code as arbitrary and unreasonable. This is premised upon a construction of their requirement of a building permit as a prerequisite to any and all repairs, however trivial, by a householder to his residence.
If the code was applied administratively to require formal permits for trivial repairs, a serious question of its constitutionality, as applied, would arise, but this record does not present the question. The repair and remodeling work undertaken by Walker was both major and extensive, and well within the reasonable reach of the code.
For the reasons stated in the opinion of the District Court, * we find no unconstitutional infirmity in the building code as applied in this case.
Affirmed.
Walker v. State of North Carolina, W.D.N.C., 262 F.Supp. 102.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
372 F.2d 129, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 7764, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-r-walker-v-state-of-north-carolina-and-city-of-charlotte-ca4-1967.