James R. Stringer v. Charles J. Jackson, Interim Commissioner, Mississippi Department of Corrections

Fifth Circuit

James R. Stringer v. Charles J. Jackson, Interim Commissioner, Mississippi Department of Corrections

909 F.2d 111

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedSeptember 10, 1990

Docket88-4126

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 909 F.2d 111 (James R. Stringer v. Charles J. Jackson, Interim Commissioner, Mississippi Department of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

James R. Stringer v. Charles J. Jackson, Interim Commissioner, Mississippi Department of Corrections, 909 F.2d 111 (5th Cir. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

REAVLEY, Circuit Judge:

This cause has been remanded to us by the Supreme Court for reconsideration in light of Clemons v. Mississippi, 494 U.S.-, 110 S.Ct. 1441, 108 L.Ed.2d 725 (1990). The problem corresponds to the issue treated in Maynard v. Cartwright, 486 U.S. 356, 108 S.Ct. 1853, 100 L.Ed.2d 372 (1988). The Attorney General of Mississippi objects to our application of these two cases here on the ground that Stringer’s conviction was final prior to either decision, and therefore any claim on that ground is barred by Teague v. Lane, 489 U.S. 288, 109 S.Ct. 1060, 103 L.Ed.2d 334 (1989). That objection is well taken.

Stringer’s conviction was final on February 19, 1985 when the Supreme Court denied his petition for writ of certiorari directed at his conviction and sentence. Stringer v. Mississippi, 469 U.S. 1230, 105 S.Ct. 1231, 84 L.Ed.2d 368 (1985). A panel of the Fifth Circuit has recently held that claims raised under Clemons and Maynard are not available to a habeas petitioner whose conviction was final prior to these decisions, because they constitute a new rule of law under Teague. Smith v. Black, 904 F.2d 950, (5th Cir.1990).

We therefore reinstate our previous judgment. Stringer v. Jackson, 862 F.2d 1108 (5th Cir.1988). The judgment of the district court denying the writ is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

REAVLEY, Circuit Judge:

This cause has been remanded to us by the Supreme Court for reconsideration in light of Clemons v. Mississippi, 494 U.S.-, 110 S.Ct. 1441, 108 L.Ed.2d 725 (1990). The problem corresponds to the issue treated in Maynard v. Cartwright, 486 U.S. 356, 108 S.Ct. 1853, 100 L.Ed.2d 372 (1988). The Attorney General of Mississippi objects to our application of these two cases here on the ground that Stringer’s conviction was final prior to either decision, and therefore any claim on that ground is barred by Teague v. Lane, 489 U.S. 288, 109 S.Ct. 1060, 103 L.Ed.2d 334 (1989). That objection is well taken.

Stringer’s conviction was final on February 19, 1985 when the Supreme Court denied his petition for writ of certiorari directed at his conviction and sentence. Stringer v. Mississippi, 469 U.S. 1230, 105 S.Ct. 1231, 84 L.Ed.2d 368 (1985). A panel of the Fifth Circuit has recently held that claims raised under Clemons and Maynard are not available to a habeas petitioner whose conviction was final prior to these decisions, because they constitute a new rule of law under Teague. Smith v. Black, 904 F.2d 950, (5th Cir.1990).

We therefore reinstate our previous judgment. Stringer v. Jackson, 862 F.2d 1108 (5th Cir.1988). The judgment of the district court denying the writ is AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

909 F.2d 111, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-r-stringer-v-charles-j-jackson-interim-commissioner-mississippi-ca5-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack