James R. Lockwood and Joyce M. Lockwood v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
This text of 435 F.2d 1308 (James R. Lockwood and Joyce M. Lockwood v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The decision of the tax court is affirmed except as to the assessment of a negligence penalty on the wife’s separate return.
The deficiencies found in reporting were simply the resolution of factual questions.
The case on the deficiencies could have been resolved the other way, but we cannot find the tax court was clearly erroneous.
As to Mrs. Lockwood, the record seems clear that she was wholly inert in the business transactions and the tax reporting. We cannot sustain the small negligence penalty as to her.
Remanded for proceedings consistent herewith.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
435 F.2d 1308, 27 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 71, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-r-lockwood-and-joyce-m-lockwood-v-commissioner-of-internal-revenue-ca9-1971.