James R. Hiatt v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 8, 2008
Docket04-08-00685-CR
StatusPublished

This text of James R. Hiatt v. State (James R. Hiatt v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
James R. Hiatt v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

i i i i i i

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-08-00685-CR

James R. HIATT, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 144th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2006-CR-2741 Honorable Catherine Torres-Stahl, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice Rebecca Simmons, Justice Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Delivered and Filed: October 8, 2008

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION

Appellant was sentenced on May 30, 2008. A timely motion for new trial was filed, and

therefore appellant’s notice of appeal was due to be filed on August 28, 2008; a motion for extension

of time to file a notice of appeal was due on September 12, 2008. See TEX . R. APP . P. 26.2(a), 26.3.

Appellant filed his notice of appeal in the trial court on September 4, 2008, but did not file a motion

for extension of time to file a late notice of appeal in this Court. See TEX . R. APP . P. 26.3. When

a notice of appeal and a motion for extension of time are not filed within the fifteen-day grace period 04-08-00685-CR

after the deadline for filing notice of appeal, the appellate court lacks jurisdiction. TEX . R. APP . P.

26.3; Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996); see also Ater v. Eighth Court of

Appeals, 802 S.W.2d 241, 243 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991) (out-of-time appeal from final felony

conviction may be sought by filing a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to article 11.07 of the Texas

Code of Criminal Procedure). We issued an order on September 19, 2008 directing appellant to

show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Appellant’s counsel

responded in writing and agreed that this Court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal. TEX . R. APP . P.

26.3; Olivo, 918 S.W.2d at 522. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

DO NOT PUBLISH

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals
802 S.W.2d 241 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1991)
Olivo v. State
918 S.W.2d 519 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
James R. Hiatt v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-r-hiatt-v-state-texapp-2008.