James Pease v. Mary Jane Pease
This text of James Pease v. Mary Jane Pease (James Pease v. Mary Jane Pease) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
June 27, 2017 Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice
154520 Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein Joan L. Larsen JAMES E. PEASE, Kurtis T. Wilder, Plaintiff-Appellant, Justices
v SC: 154520 COA: 332282 Wayne CC: 97-731630-DO MARY JANE PEASE, Defendant-Appellee.
_________________________________________/
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 31, 2016 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
WILDER, J., did not participate because he was on the Court of Appeals panel.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. June 27, 2017 p0619 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
James Pease v. Mary Jane Pease, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-pease-v-mary-jane-pease-mich-2017.