James Parrott v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)

Opinion

MEMORANDUM DECISION FILED

Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), Aug 01 2018, 10:03 am this Memorandum Decision shall not be CLERK

regarded as precedent or cited before any Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals

court except for the purpose of establishing and Tax Court

the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the law of the case.

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE Darren Bedwell Curtis T. Hill, Jr. Marion County Public Defender Attorney General of Indiana Indianapolis, Indiana Chandra K. Hein Deputy Attorney General Indianapolis, Indiana

IN THE

COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA

James Parrott, August 1, 2018 Appellant-Defendant, Court of Appeals Case No.

49A02-1712-CR-2761

v. Appeal from the Marion Superior Court

State of Indiana, The Honorable Jose D. Salinas, Appellee-Plaintiff Judge Trial Court Cause No. 49G14-1511-F6-40302

Baker, Judge.

Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 49A02-1712-CR-2761 | August 1, 2018 Page 1 of 2

[1] On November 6, 2017, the trial court found Parrott guilty of multiple offenses,

including Class B misdemeanor possession of marijuana. The same day, the

trial court sentenced Parrott. The sentencing order classifies Parrott’s

possession of marijuana conviction as a Class A misdemeanor. The State

concedes on appeal that the sentencing order is erroneous due to an apparent

scrivener’s error. We therefore remand with instructions to correct the

sentencing order to reflect that Parrott’s possession of marijuana conviction is a

Class B, rather than a Class A, misdemeanor.

[2] The judgment of the trial court is remanded with instructions to correct the

sentencing order.

May, J., and Robb, J., concur.

Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 49A02-1712-CR-2761 | August 1, 2018 Page 2 of 2