James P. Thompson and Eugene Haas v. Warden Harry Tinsley

Tenth Circuit

James P. Thompson and Eugene Haas v. Warden Harry Tinsley

287 F.2d 570

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

DecidedNovember 16, 1960

Docket6513

StatusPublished

This text of 287 F.2d 570 (James P. Thompson and Eugene Haas v. Warden Harry Tinsley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

James P. Thompson and Eugene Haas v. Warden Harry Tinsley, 287 F.2d 570 (10th Cir. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

287 F.2d 570

James P. THOMPSON and Eugene Haas
v.
Warden Harry TINSLEY.

No. 6513.

United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.

November 16, 1960.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Colorado.

James Croft Fattor, Denver, Colo., for appellants.

Duke W. Dunbar, Atty. Gen., and J. F. Brauer, Asst. Atty. Gen., State of Colorado, for appellee.

Before BRATTON, PICKETT and BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed without written opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

287 F.2d 570

James P. THOMPSON and Eugene Haas
v.
Warden Harry TINSLEY.

No. 6513.

United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.

November 16, 1960.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Colorado.

James Croft Fattor, Denver, Colo., for appellants.

Duke W. Dunbar, Atty. Gen., and J. F. Brauer, Asst. Atty. Gen., State of Colorado, for appellee.

Before BRATTON, PICKETT and BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed without written opinion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

287 F.2d 570, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-p-thompson-and-eugene-haas-v-warden-harry-ti-ca10-1960.