James P. Smith & Co. v. United States
124 F. 291, 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 4987
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York·Decided July 23, 1903·No. No. 2,805·Published
Opinion
The bottles are dutiable under paragraph 99, Schedule B, § i, c. n, of the tariff act of July 24, 1897, 30 Stat. 156 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1633], as the duty in each case upon the contents, under paragraphs 258, 276, Schedule G, § 1, c. 11, 30 Stat. 151, 172 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, pp. 1650, 1652], is specific. The cases, therefore, to which attention is called (Kauffmann Bros. v. U. S. [C. C.] 99 Fed. 430, and In re Johnson [C. C.] 56 Fed. 822) do not apply.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
James P. Smith & Co. v. United States, 124 F. 291, 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 4987 (circtsdny 1903).
124 F. 291 (James P. Smith & Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re Johnson
56 F. 822 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York, 1893)
Kauffmann Bros. v. United States
99 F. 430 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York, 1899)