James P. Rangel and Paula Grace v. Vanderbilt Mortgage and Finance, Inc.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 7, 2017
Docket03-17-00068-CV
StatusPublished

This text of James P. Rangel and Paula Grace v. Vanderbilt Mortgage and Finance, Inc. (James P. Rangel and Paula Grace v. Vanderbilt Mortgage and Finance, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
James P. Rangel and Paula Grace v. Vanderbilt Mortgage and Finance, Inc., (Tex. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-17-00068-CV

James P. Rangel and Paula Grace, Appellants

v.

Vanderbilt Mortgage and Finance, Inc., Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF CALDWELL COUNTY, 421ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 16-0-072, HONORABLE TODD A. BLOMERTH, JUDGE PRESIDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellants James P. Rangel and Paula Grace filed their notice of appeal on

January 25, 2017. We notified them that they were required to make a written request and

arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record and the reporter’s record within ten days from their receipt

of our letter. The clerk’s record from the trial court was due to be filed in this Court on February 27.

On March 10, this Court notified appellants that no clerk’s record had been filed due

to their failure to pay or make arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the clerk’s record. The

Court’s notice requested that appellants make arrangements for the clerk’s record and submit a status

report regarding this appeal by March 20. In addition, the notice informed appellants that their

appeal was subject to dismissal if they did not comply with our instructions. To date, appellants

have not filed a status report or otherwise responded to this Court’s notice, and the clerk’s record has

not been filed. If the trial court’s clerk fails to file the clerk’s record due to appellant’s failure to pay

or make arrangements to pay for the clerk’s fee for preparing the record, the appellate court may

dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless the appellant was entitled to proceed without

payment of costs. Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). In this case, appellants have not established that they are

entitled to proceed without payment of costs, see Tex. R. App. P. 20.1 (providing procedure for

establishing inability to pay court costs on appeal), Tex. R. Civ. P. 145 (providing procedure in trial

court for determining party’s claim of indigence), and they have failed to pay or make arrangements

to pay the clerk’s fee for preparing the clerk’s record. We therefore dismiss the appeal for want of

prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).

__________________________________________ Cindy Olson Bourland, Justice

Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Field and Bourland

Dismissed for Want of Prosecution

Filed: April 7, 2017

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
James P. Rangel and Paula Grace v. Vanderbilt Mortgage and Finance, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-p-rangel-and-paula-grace-v-vanderbilt-mortgage-and-finance-inc-texapp-2017.