James P. MacCormack v. Mutual of Omaha
This text of 806 F.2d 262 (James P. MacCormack v. Mutual of Omaha) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
James P. MACCORMACK, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
MUTUAL OF OMAHA, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 85-1949.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
Oct. 15, 1986.
Before KRUPANSKY and RYAN, Circuit Judges, and EDWARDS, Senior Circuit Judge.
ORDER
This cause having come on to be heard upon the record, the briefs and the oral argument of the parties, and upon due consideration thereof, the court finds that there is substantial evidence to support the verdict of the jury and that no prejudicial error in the record or in the proceedings has intervened.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the judgment of the district court be, and it hereby is, affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
806 F.2d 262, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 32266, 1986 WL 18082, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-p-maccormack-v-mutual-of-omaha-ca6-1986.