James P. Dameron v. W. E. Harson

Fifth Circuit

James P. Dameron v. W. E. Harson

364 F.2d 991, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 5375

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedJuly 25, 1966

Docket23433

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 364 F.2d 991 (James P. Dameron v. W. E. Harson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

James P. Dameron v. W. E. Harson, 364 F.2d 991, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 5375 (5th Cir. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

James P. Dameron, under indictment for murder and in the custody of the Sheriff of Lafayette Parish, Louisiana, filed this application for habeas corpus. In addition, he has prayed for injunctive relief against the Sheriff, the District Attorney of the Fifteenth Judicial District of Louisiana, and a Judge of the Fifteenth Judicial District Court, to restrain them from proceeding with his prosecution. The district court, after a hearing February 9, 1956, dismissed the application. Dameron appeals from the order of the district court.

The district judge’s opinion thoroughly reviews the facts and the law relevant to the petitioner’s contentions. We adopt that opinion as the opinion of this Court and affirm the judgment below. Dameron v. Harson et al., W.D.La.1966, 255 F.Supp. 533.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

James P. Dameron, under indictment for murder and in the custody of the Sheriff of Lafayette Parish, Louisiana, filed this application for habeas corpus. In addition, he has prayed for injunctive relief against the Sheriff, the District Attorney of the Fifteenth Judicial District of Louisiana, and a Judge of the Fifteenth Judicial District Court, to restrain them from proceeding with his prosecution. The district court, after a hearing February 9, 1956, dismissed the application. Dameron appeals from the order of the district court.

The district judge’s opinion thoroughly reviews the facts and the law relevant to the petitioner’s contentions. We adopt that opinion as the opinion of this Court and affirm the judgment below. Dameron v. Harson et al., W.D.La.1966, 255 F.Supp. 533.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

364 F.2d 991, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 5375, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-p-dameron-v-w-e-harson-ca5-1966.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack